4-D architectural, kinematical and mechanical evolution of continental and oceanic low-angle normal faults and detachments
Co-organized by GD2
Convener:
Costantino ZuccariECSECS
|
Co-conveners:
Olivier Lacombe,
Cristiano Collettini,
Bernhard Grasemann,
Geoffroy Mohn
Mon, 16:15
For this reason, constraints on brittle and ductile strain localisation and on their precise age of activation are increasingly relevant. This acquires a higher importance by looking at the architecture and mechanics of extensional detachments, where through-time superposed domains with different mineralogy and, thus, petrophysical properties, dramatically change the mechanical response of shear- and fault zones during progressive deformation. Coexisting or partitioned seismic vs. aseismic deformation, as well as repeated cycles of shear zone weakening/hardening and syn-tectonic fluid flow and fluid-rock interactions, might be governed by this through-time (and still partially underinvestigated) structural complexities.
- What guides this different deformation response of shear and fault zones?
- What allows the initiation and evolution of detachment zones, should they be continental or oceanic, and which processes act coevally or diachronously?
- What is the link between detachment formation and hydrothermal activity?
- What is the role of tectonic or thermal inheritance in the formation of LANFs and detachments?
All contributions fostering discussions on these points are welcome in this session, including comparisons between continental and oceanic systems. We encourage the submission of research based on a multidisciplinary and multiscale approach, encompassing, among others, field analysis, seismic and other geophysical investigations, numerical and laboratory modelling and absolute dating and petrological constraints of syn-kinematic fabrics and mineralisation.
X2.135
|
EGU26-10064
|
solicited
|
Highlight
X2.139
|
EGU26-8084
|
ECS
X2.140
|
EGU26-8477
|
ECS
X2.144
|
EGU26-10273
|
ECS